uaepaster.blogg.se

1. Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii 1080p#
2. Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii upgrade#
3. Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii pro#
4. Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii iso#

So if you point your camera at a subject, focus, and then recompose, wouldnt the plane of focus now be slightly behind your subject?ĭid you do some real calculations with the real angles and distances involved? If you do, you will see focus and recompose is not really an issue. Isnt the plane of focus supposed to be flat and parallel to the sensor? You can quite safely focus with AF points at the edge of the AF point matrix and recompose just a bit, even with some field curvature. That is a hyperbolic statement, "in the middle". The Canon has very strong field curvature, and focus/recompose is not that good of an idea.Īnd you can't do anything because the focus points are in the middle. I can focus and recompose with that lens without hesitation. The Nikkor has quite low field curvature. I have two very similar lenses, a Nikkor-S If the lens has (almost) no field curvature at the focus distance setting, the image will not be out of focus.

So there is no solution,if recompose images will be out of focus. Not sure how good live view is on the 5D III though. You can run into OOF issues anyway, but that will then have to do with the lens having a field curvature issue.ĭPAF on the 5D IV makes the situation a bit better, I can just use live view to focus on most of those spots towards the edge of the frame. If you actually would calculate the angles and distances involved, you would realise that focus and recompose does not pose an issue focus distance wise. For shots with shallow DOF, you'll probably want to carefully adjust the focus manually after recomposing. The ultimate module for consumers who film with dslrs.I run into the same issues with my 5D IV no choice but to focus + recompose.

Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii upgrade#

upgrade the bodies as things improve and get cheaper.but the codec + computer stays as is or can improve and upgrade too.

Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii 1080p#

So now everyone can just buy any dslr they may want at their affordability level.then that module and voila.everyone gets to record high quality 1080p out of their cameras. In it.you place a computer capable of properly downsampling to 1080 whatever the megapixels of the camera its attached to, at different framerates, with its own heatsink.then save it as prores.

Here's an idea, create a module shaped like a battery grip which you can insert with any dslr FF or apsc, interface thru USB and take over the camera's computer during video caprture. Sensors and all other stuff are already amazing, ( as evidenced by the stills they can produce).its just up to their internal processors and codec. So I'm guessing what camera manufacturers should be investing in is loading up much much more powerful computers inside their dslrs that can take up the live processing of 24 megapixels to 1080p. With modern sensors from Sony (24 mpix apsc/24mpix FF) and the others.shouldnt we be having extra detailed, hi res, high DR, and very clean, 1080ps with them but were not.from any brand.

Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii iso#

With the recent AMAZING demos of the power of the RED Dragon sensor (20+ DR, Native 2000 ISO etc).all with a 24 megapizel Super35 sensor.I can't understand the excuse of DSLR companies having less tha stellar resolution of HD than the RED is capable of when you downscale 6K to 4K then 4K to 1080p.I mean.should'nt 1080p benefit for the oversampled pixels of photo cameras (16-24 at the moment).and these problems of moire and resolution shouldnt even come up. While the Nikon D800 will resolve more detail and has clean HDMI, and the Mark III won't have any noticeable aliasing/moire (and is getting clean HDMI), the 6D is right up there with the best low-light performers Canon has ever made - at least a stop better than the Mark III thanks to the lower pixel count.

I haven't had the chance to shoot with it yet, but if I was just getting started and looking at a full-frame DSLR, unless you've got another $1,000 or so to spend, the 6D looks like a great option. I still like full-frame a lot, even if shooting with an APS-C sensor is much easier on focus, and while shooting with a DSLR can sometimes be a major pain, I think the 30 minute record time combined with the higher resolution HDMI output during recording is a huge benefit to the 6D (since you're stuck with about 20 minutes per clip on the 7D - not to mention that camera is prone to overheating).

Focus point on canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii pro#

imported as DSLR footage to Premiere Pro CS5.5, exported to H.264 1080 24P, 7Mbps. No color grading was done in any clips in this video.